29 August 2008

Post 150!

It's been, I realize, a goodly while since I've been able to post. Because of this (furthermore, because this is my 150th post), I figured I'd go for the knock-their-socks-off approach, and I therefore offer the following disclaimer:

I ASSUME THAT MOST OF YOU READ THIS BLOG WHILE SITTING DOWN; IF THIS IS UNTRUE OF YOUR CURRENT STATE, I BEG YOU TO REMEDY THAT BEFORE READING ANY MORE OF THIS POST.

Everybody sitting down? Good. Here we go.

I--

uh

I--

(Good heavens! This is more painful than I expected! Confessions generally are, though....)

I read a book--a fictional book--a fantasy novel! And I read it--all the way through! Wretched, wretched, escapist literature--and I enjoyed it! Oh woe is me! What have I done? I was such a nice fellow; how could this happen?

*sigh*

Well, I believe the worst is behind us now. I will now proceed to tell you about this book and my experience with it:

I must admit, I found myself honestly suffering through this story at times. You must understand, I am not the sort of man who feels a moral obligation to finish things I start (especially books--especially fantasy novels), but I felt I had to make it through this one. It was a pride issue, really: you see, there are a handful of fictional books (perhaps as many as three or four) that I'd kinda like to read, but they've all either been recommended to me by Confuzzled or Thmazing, and I can't have either one of them feeling the right to gloat over having persuaded me to indulge myself with lies, so I figured I go with a book that neither one of them have recommended to me (to my recollection), a book that (with any luck) neither of them have read.

Ha! Take that, my literary tormentors!

The book is Alcatraz Versus the Evil Librarians by Brandon Sanderson, and (this is the part where my pride really takes a beating:) I think I'd actually recommend it fairly unilaterally. But you must remember, this recommendation comes from a guy who doesn't like fiction.

I just finished reading Alcatraz today. As I was reading it on the couch in my living room, one of my roommates walked in and asked what I was reading.

"Stupid, wretched, escapist fiction, I'm afraid," I said: "Alcatraz Versus the Evil Librarians."

"Do you like it?" he asked.

"Well," I said, "the plot is fairly uninteresting, and I don't really like any of the characters...."

He laughed. "But the font is nice?"

"Oh yes," I said, laughing also. "The font is very nice."

But I lied. I don't like the font. I mean, it was mostly a pretty standard font with unobtrusive serif, but the author chose to put hand-written notes in a sloppy, san-serif font that was supposed to look like handwriting, and I think that's dumb.

So that's pretty much my recommendation: I didn't really like the characters much, though they were occasionally entertaining, and I didn't really enjoy the plot, though it was occasionally interesting, and I didn't even like the fonts all that much. But I did enjoy the book as a whole.

Now you may find yourself wondering what's left to enjoy in a novel once you take away its plot, characters, and font(s); if that is the case, you and I are not very much alike because I say that, once you take away a story's plot and characters, you have only the most essential part left: the voice.

My friend Schlange is in the off-and-on conceptual stages of writing his first novel. I, being a red-pen nut, thoroughly enjoy attacking his comma usage when he sends me partial drafts. The last time he thus employed my services was about a month ago. Here is an excerpt from the email I sent him (I think it will help you to understand my recommendation for Alcatraz):

I am officially an English Language major. Basically, I'm getting my BA in grammar and punctuation. These things are kind of a big deal to me. I tell you this, not because I think you don't know, but because it will be necessary for you to bear in mind as you read the following that I am a BIG fan of good grammar etc.

One of the reasons that I love to read what you write so much is that you have a very distinct voice when you're telling a story, and it's a good one. Remember that one night when I printed off a couple of your blog posts and proceeded to tell you why the one about pastries was better than the one about speaking good? It's because of that happy, I'm-telling-a-story-I'm-excited-about voice that you get when you're writing in your element. I have a friend from back home who occasionally sends me stories that he's working on, and I always dread reading his stuff because, even though his stories are generally very good, his voice is so flat that I have the darndest time musceling through. But you have a great voice; your voice makes your writing worth reading. So this little grammar lesson I'm about to give you, you can take it or leave it, but just don't let it screw up your voice!


With that said, all I really have left to say regarding Alcatraz is, though the plot is fairly conventional and the characters are occasionally a bit too quirky to be truly lovable, the story telling is A-grade fantastic! The novel is in 1st person, and at the beginning of almost every chapter, Alcatraz stops telling the story and goes off on random tangents. I, being the sort of person who would rather read a well-written essay than any book-length fiction, enjoyed these so thoroughly that, rather than seeming to get in the way of the story, I felt the story detracted from the tangents! I mentioned above that I occasionally found myself suffering through the story at times, but that was only because I wished Al would stop telling me his stupid story and go back to the good stuff.

Strange, no?

But even when he was telling the story, his descriptions were always really entertaining. Also, if you ever do read this book, be sure to pay attention to the way he spells pterodactyl--I thought it was an especially subtle and clever running joke.

So that's pretty much my review, but I'm not done yet. This'll make for a kinda lengthy blog post, so if you're tired, you can stop reading now, but I'd like to include some little excerpts from the book just so you can get a feel for the voice that I'm so enamored of. (Just a sidenote, I found myself laughing out loud at times despite my telling myself over and over, "Hey, kid, it really isn't that funny!" So if you don't find these funny, that's probably because they aren't.) The first of these excerpts is directed at anyone who has ever recommended a book to me; the rest are just fun little excerpts that caught my attention.

FROM PAGE 49-50:

{Open Quote}

I'd like to take this opportunity to commend you for reading this book. [...] [M]y experience has been that people generally don't recommend this kind of book at all. It is far too interesting. Perhaps you have had other kinds of books recommended to you. Perhaps, even, you have been given books by friends, parents, or teachers, then told that these books are the type you "have to read." Those books are invariably described as "important"--which, in my experience, pretty much means that they're boring. (Words like meaningful and thoughtful are other good clues.)

If there is a boy in these kinds of books, he will not go on an adventure to fight against Librarians, paper monsters, and one-eyed Dark Oculators. In fact, the lad will not go on an adventure or fight against anything at all. Instead, his dog will die. Or, in some cases, his mother will die. If it's a really meaningful book, both his dog and his mother will die. (Apparently, most writers have something against dogs and mothers.)

Neither my mother nor my dog dies in this book. I'm rather tired of those types of stories. In my opinion, such fantastical, unrealistic books--books in which boys live on mountains, families work on farms, or anyone has anything to do with the Great Depression--have a tendency to rot the brain. To combat such silliness, I've written the volume you now hold--a solid, true account. Hopefully, it will help anchor you in reality.

So, when people try to give you some book with a shiny round award on the cover, be kind and gracious, but tell them that you don't read "fantasy," because you prefer stories that are real. Then come back here and continue your research on the cult of evil Librarians who secretly rule the world."

{Close Quote}

FROM PAGE 68:

{Open Quote}

Remember, despite the fact that this book is being sold as a "fantasy" novel, you must take all of this things it says extremely seriously, as they are quite important, are in no way silly, and always make sense.

Rutabaga.

{Close Quote}

FROM PAGE 143-4:

{Open Quote}

You may think those above paragraphs are some kind of foreshadowing. You're right. Of course, those thoughts weren't foreshadowing when they occurred to me. I couldn't know that they'd be important.

I tend to have a lot of ridiculous thoughts. I'm having some right now. Most of these certainly aren't important. And so, I usually only mention the ones that matter. For instance, I could have told you that many of the lanterns in the library looked like types of fruits and vegetables. But that has no real relevance to the plot, so I left it out. Likewise, I could have included the scene where I notices the roots of Bastille's hair and wondered why she dyed it silver, rather than letting it grow its natural red. But since that part isn't relevant to the -

Oh. Wait. Actually, that is relevant. Never mind.

{Close Quote}

FROM PAGE 183:

{Open Quote}

People can do great things. However, there are something they just can't do. I, for instance, have not been able to transform myself into a Popsicle, despite years of effort. I could, however, make myself insane, if I wished. (Though if I achieved the second, I might be able to make myself think I'd achieved the first....)

Anyway, if there's a lesson to be learned, it's this: Great success often depends upon being able to distinguish between the impossible and the improbable. Or, in easier terms, distinguishing between Popsicles and insanity.

Any questions?

{Close Quote}

FROM PAGE 250-1:

{Open Quote}

Now, I would like to take this opportunity to point out that I didn't take the opportunity to point out anything at the beginning of this chapter. Never fear; my editorial comments were simply delayed for a few moments.

You see, that last chapter ended with a terribly unfair hook. By now, it is probably very late at night, and you have stayed up to read this book when you should have got to sleep. If this is the case, then I commend you for falling into my trap. It is a writer's greatest pleasure to hear that someone was kept up until the unholy hours of the morning reading one of his books. It foes back to authors being terrible people who delight in the suffering of others. Plus, we get a kickback from the caffeine industry.

Regardless, because of how exciting things were, I didn't feel comfortable interjecting my normal comments at the beginning of this chapter. So, I shall put them here instead. Prepare yourself.

Blah, blah, sacrifice, alters, daggers, sharks. Blah, blah, something pretentious. Blah, blah, rutabaga. Blah, blah, something that makes no sense whatsoever.

Now back to the story.

{Close quote}

There are also a goodly number of allusions in this book, which I thoroughly enjoyed. Most were very brief, so I'm not sure I caught them all, but I did catch one to To Kill a Mockingbird, on to "The Raven," one to The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy, one to Monty Python and the Search for the Holy Grail, and one to something like but not necessarily The Count of Monte Cristo.

So there you have it. As a parting shot, I've got to tell you that the thing that really sold me on this book was (of all things!) the teaser on the inside flap:

A HERO WITH AN INCREDIBLE TALENT... FOR BREAKING THINGS.

A LIFE-OR-DEATH MISSION... TO RESCUE A BAG OF SAND.

A FEARSOME THREAT FROM THE POWERFUL SECRET NETWORK THAT RULES THE WORLD... THE EVIL LIBRARIANS.

27 comments:

  1. I am still going to gloat. Because you have just proved my point that fantasy novels are not, by any means, completely irredeemable!

    Also, curse you! Now I really want to read that book and I so don't have time to do so right now . . .

    Lastly, if you liked the voice in those novels, you should really check out Jonathan Stroud's Bartimaeus Trilogy. It has that outrageously funny snarky quality going on . . .

    ReplyDelete
  2. .

    How funny. I just added this book to my mental to-read list next to Bartimaeus. So. When they fall in my hands. Et cetera.

    ReplyDelete
  3. It's always interesting to learn what people look for in a book that would interest them. For me it is the story line, it has to be appealing and caught my interest. I like the writing styles as well, certain writers have certain quirks that gets infused in their writings.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Lol. Wow I just may have to read that! ^.^ I'm all for the random silly stuff.

    Yeah, the thing that keeps me hooked, be that book or movie, is the story. How it's told. A good story-teller is hard to find, but totally worth the wait. I don't really care how they do it, but I love it when they succeed. ^.^
    Stories are my escape, so if they make me forget where I am, I'm sold. ^.^ I love fantasy for that reason. lol, if it's one where the mom/dog dies, I put it away.

    Bartimaeus? I remember those! Yeah, the story line in those was incredibly dull, but the characters were just wonderful enough to keep you reading. A little dark for me though... or crude... I don't quite remember... Either way, I only read the first one.

    ReplyDelete
  5. "Stories are my escape, so if they make me forget where I am, I'm sold."

    See, that's the exact opposite of how I feel: if a story takes me totally away from reality, I feel robbed some how.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Bartimaeus? Crude? Not so much. Dark? Maybe. Funny? Most definitely. I didn't find the story lines ho-hum at all . . . the dilemma most of my friends have is that the character they most love is a snarky spirit who doesn't like to show his redeemable qualities. And the main human character is flawed. Very fundamentally flawed. Which is what makes it great . . .

    ReplyDelete
  7. Wow... People responding to me. ^.^ I feel loved.

    Schmetter: Well you're just weird. ;P
    Robbed? Really? Huh... Ok, I guess I can see that. So you like reality?... Ewww! Yuck! >.< See, I tend to run from it whenever I can... Not healty I realize... but it's what I do.
    Part of it is that when I see sad things I take them personally... Aah! A man was stabbed in China! Oh nooes! I'm walking down the street! What if I'm stabbed! O.o; ... That sort of thing...
    In fantasy I at least know that it'll end up all right. (at least in the fantasy I read) Whatever the character goes through, whatever struggles against the dark, they will always come out on top. ^.^ I know it's not real, so however dark it gets, it's ok.
    When it's real life stuf... It's never as cut and dry... There are casualties by the road side... And then it can hit a little too close to home... It could happen... Guy stabbed in China sort of thing for me... *shrug*

    Confuzzled: Hm... Yeah, it was something I know... At least for me. But yeah, the characters were absolutely awesome! ^.^ Loveable snarkiness. And I loved the little side notes from the genie dude (Bartimaeus, if I remember correctly >.o). Those were just too funny.
    And yeah, I love flawed characters. ^.^ If they're too perfect *cough*Superman*cough* then it's just not fun... You can't relate to them when they're too perfect. Letting them have flaws allows you to relate to the characters. It can be the best story line in the history of stoies, but if you can't relate to the characters, it won't keep your attention.
    I am of the opinion that a poor storyline can be saved (up to a point) with good enough characters.
    Although I still didn't like the story line for Bartimaeus... Too predictible I seem to remember. At least the first one, it might have gotton better later. I knew what would happen long before it actually did... There were some parts that were good, but over all, it just didn't do it for me. Story line wise... Awesome characters, less then par story... At least to me. Heaven forbid I deny a fellow bookie the love of a book. ^.~

    ReplyDelete
  8. F-C: something doesn't have to be depressing to be realistic. I mean, is life really so depressing that anything that doesn't have magic and wizards is going to be sad?

    ReplyDelete
  9. And that my friend, is the question...

    ReplyDelete
  10. .

    I don't understand the question. What, I'm not a wizard anymore? This is real life, people! Kazowie!

    ReplyDelete
  11. I would have to ditto Schmetterling. Non-fiction and memoir--books about reality--are not, by definition, depressing.

    Indeed, many of them can be hilariously funny. And they're that much more funny because they're true.

    ReplyDelete
  12. And, in the same way, fiction that seeks to reflect the 'real world' can also present a rollicking good time.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Oh, and Theric, how's that therapy going? Not so well, I'd wager, since you're now trying to send magic through blog comments....

    ReplyDelete
  14. .

    Before you make any more snide comments, I think you had better remove your socks and check out the color of your toenails.

    ReplyDelete
  15. !?!?!?!?!?!?!

    HOW THE CRAP DID YOU DO THAT??

    ReplyDelete
  16. Lol. ^.^ So that's puce...

    Hm... Well then it must just be that I read the wrong non-fiction.
    'Cause whenever I look at something "real" it's depressing... I dont know that I've ever read a happy non-fiction book... Seen a happy n-f movie, but then it's only loosely based on reality.

    Anyone have a sugjestion for a good happy read? I'm actually between books right now. (well... waiting for Brisinger, but that's beside the point. ^.^; 11 days! >.< ... *ehem*...)

    ReplyDelete
  17. Read almost any Bill Bryson. That's quite happy non-fiction. Notes from a Small Island is funny, as are most of his other books. I've also heard wonderful things about his memoir The Life and Times of the Thunderbolt Kid, but I've not yet read it.

    Also on my recommended list:
    The Zookeeper's Wife (which is set in a depressing time, granted, but is ultimately one of the most uplifting books I've read in the past year or so)
    The Prize Winner of Defiance, Ohio . . . sure, the father is a drunk--but again, the story is uplifting and incredibly funny in parts
    The Geography of Bliss was excellent. And come on--it's a guy searching for the happiest places. What's depressing about that?
    Eats, Shoots, and Leaves may well be one of the funniest things ever written. And it's non-fiction. About punctuation. You might not believe me, but you should read it. And then you'll believe me.
    Ex Libris: Confessions of a Common Reader is an excellent collection of essays by Anne Fadiman . . . all about her reading habits.
    I greatly enjoyed Frank McCourt's memoir Teacher Man
    The Know-It-All--highly entertaining book about a man who reads the entire Encylopedia Britannica in a year, hoping it will make him smarter. Same author wrote about another year-long experiment in The Year of Living Biblically, but it wasn't nearly as funny.

    Now go, and read ye non-fiction!

    ReplyDelete
  18. Why don't you ever tell me to go read me non-fiction, Confuzzled?

    ReplyDelete
  19. Um, because I don't have to. I tell you to go and read ye fiction.

    Except I don't even have to tell you that anymore because you did . . . and you enjoyed it.

    Drat it all! Now what am I going to heckle you about?

    ReplyDelete
  20. I dunno. But I have full confidence in your ability to find something.

    ReplyDelete
  21. I'm glad someone has confidence in my ability to do something . . . Even if said something is heckling.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Bill Bryson? Ok... I'll have to look into that one... *runs of to library*
    Eats shoots and leaves! I actually have that one. And yeah, it's quite funny. ^.^ Although not the best sheer reading book simply because it's not a story. But still some funny stuff.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Wow... We have a big library... Who knew? Anyway, found The Life and Times of the Thunderbolt Kid. They didn't have Island. Plus I picked up a book by Joe Barbara (from Hana Barbara). It looks good actually.
    And I lied when I said I'd never read a good non-fiction. I read Boy by Rhald Dahl when I was younger. Still one of my favorites. ^.^ Awesome book that one.
    ...
    So I guess I have to say that not all non-fiction is horrible... Although I still love my fantasy. ^.~

    ReplyDelete
  24. Yay! Look at me! Due to my amazing magical skills, you're reading non-fiction and Schmetterling is reading fiction!

    Hmm . . . now I don't know what else, exactly, I can accomplish with my life . . .

    ReplyDelete
  25. Confuzzled: Lol! Well look at you go! Who knows? Maybe you could be the person who finally gets to cure the common cold!

    ReplyDelete
  26. I'm not sure how I missed this post for long enough for it to accrue 26 comments...

    I loved it =D! I hope that's not just because of my vanity... thanks for the flattery of sharing your love for my writing across cyber space - maybe I'd better switch my toggle back to on.

    Now... I think I'm off to the library to find some evil librarians!

    ReplyDelete